GaitSmart is working with NELFT to improve the mobility and reduce the risk of falling of older people under hospital care.

The North East London Foundation Trust (NELFT) has been running a Quality Improvement Programme to ascertain whether elderly people under the care of the community hospital could improve their mobility and frailty through an intervention using GaitSmart.

The programme included four GaitSmart tests per volunteer with one test every 2-4 weeks and a personalised treatment plan based on the individual test results.  The volunteers were fallers admitted to the Community Hospital or under the care of the Community Hospital and receiving Intensive Rehabilitation Service (IRS) at home, including some who had suffered a hip fracture.

The results have shown that this programme yields a high Return on Investment (ROI) and reduces the risk of falling and reliance on walking aids. It also improves frailty levels, fear of falling and the ability to undertake activities of daily living.

Programme Results

Economic Benefits

The University of East Anglia (UEA) were commissioned to develop a Health Economics Model (HEM) for this NELFT study.  The model includes the conventional method of calculating ROI and the cost of a Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY) using subjective ‘Fear of Falling’ data.  It also includes a more robust approach using objective gait data to determine ‘Risk of Falling’.

For this study cohort, where physiotherapies and GaitSmart Intervention is applied to people who suffer a fall that result in an injury and are under the Community Hospital care, the ROI is 72%, or a 72p net return for every £1 spent.

 

Clinical Benefits

  • Speed – The average speed at the start of the programme was 0.45m/s, and 0.61m/s at the end. Increasing walking speed can improve the ability to undertake activities of daily living.
  • Use of Walking Aids – At the start of the programme, 46% of the volunteers used a frame and only 18% walked unaided.  At the end of the programme, fewer of the volunteers used walking aids with only 16% requiring a frame and 41% walking unaided.
  • Frailty – The Edmonton Frailty Score (EFS) was used to determine frailty.  At the start of the programme the average EFS score was 7.8.  At the end of the programme the average EFS score dropped to 5.7.
  • Fear of Falling – Fear of falling was monitored using the Falls Efficacy Scale – International, short form (FES-I).  At the start of the programme the average volunteer had a high fear of falling, FES-I 14.6.  At the end of the programme the average volunteer had a moderate fear of falling, FES-I 11.4.
  • GaitSmart Score – The average GaitSmart Score, which summarises the measurements of key gait parameters was 25% at the start of the programme.  At the end of the programme the average had increased to 45.5%.  Frailty levels were shown to correlate strongly with the GaitSmart Score.

We use cookies to provide best site experience.